Conjoint Analysis: Consumer Preferences of Kampong Chicken in Bukittinggi City

Authors

  • Tevina Edwin Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas, Kampus II Payakumbuh
  • James Hellyward Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas
  • Adisti Rastosari Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas, Kampus II Payakumbuh
  • Yolani Utami Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas, Kampus II Payakumbuh
  • El Latifa Sri Suharto Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas, Kampus II Payakumbuh
  • Noni Novarista Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/alive.v1.n1.p51-58.2024

Keywords:

chicken, conjoint analysis, consumer, tourism area, West Sumatra

Abstract

When purchasing, consumers will prioritize the attributes attached to the product. Research needs to be done to increase consumer buying interest through consumer preference. Especially if it is done in an area with potential but little interest in Kampong chicken meat, this study aims to look at the preferences of Kampong chicken consumers in Bukittinggi City, West Sumatra, Indonesia. The research implementation time was in August 2023. This study's population is Kampong chicken consumers in several wholesale markets in Bukittinggi. For the sample size, 200 respondents had been taken. The variables in this study are a set of attributes of Kampong chicken: price, color, texture, age, gender, chicken meat parts, and chicken skin. The results showed that the highest importance value was at the age attribute of the chicken, which was 19.069, while the lowest value was the price. Based on calculations, it was found that consumers prefer affordable prices to price stabilization. The preferred meat color was meat with a pink color, chewy skin texture, medium size, 4-5 months old, male sex; the most preferred part was the breast, and the chicken was consumed without the skin.

Author Biographies

Tevina Edwin, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas, Kampus II Payakumbuh

Department of Development and Business Livestock

James Hellyward, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas

Department of Development and Business Livestock

Adisti Rastosari, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas, Kampus II Payakumbuh

Department of Animal Production Technology

Yolani Utami, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas, Kampus II Payakumbuh

Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology

El Latifa Sri Suharto, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas, Kampus II Payakumbuh

Department of Animal Products Technology

Noni Novarista, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas

Department of Development and Business Livestock

References

Aini, I. (1990). Indigenous chicken production in South-east Asia. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 46(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19900010

Al-Omari, B., Farhat, J., & Ershaid, M. (2022). Conjoint Analysis: A Research Method to Study Patients’ Preferences and Personalize Care. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020274

Andreyeva, T., Long, M. W., & Brownell, K. D. (2010). The Impact of Food Prices on Consumption: A Systematic Review of Research on the Price Elasticity of Demand for Food. American Journal of Public Health, 100(2), 216–222. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.151415

De Irala-Estévez, J., Groth, M., Johansson, L., Oltersdorf, U., Prättälä, R., & Martínez-González, M. A. (2000). A systematic review of socio-economic differences in food habits in Europe: consumption of fruit and vegetables. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 54(9), 706–714. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601080

Desta, T. T. (2021). Sustainable intensification of indigenous village chicken production system: matching the genotype with the environment. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53(3), 337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02773-5

Hair J.F., Jr., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Pearson Education Ltd; Harlow, UK: 2014.

Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(3), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129

Hidayah, R., Ambarsari, I., & Subiharta, S. (2019). Kajian Sifat Nutrisi, Fisik dan Sensori Daging Ayam KUB di Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Animal Science), 21(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.25077/jpi.21.2.93-101.2019

Ingleby, E. (2012). Research methods in education, Cohen, L. L. Manion, and K. Morrison. Professional Development in Education 2012, 38, 3, 507-509. Professional Development in Education, 38. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.643130

Mengual-Macenlle, N., Marcos, P. J., Golpe, R., & González-Rivas, D. (2015). Multivariate analysis in thoracic research. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 7(3), E2–E6. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.43

Permadi, S., Kusnadi, H., Ivanti, L., Hidayat, T., Puspitasari, R., & Ambarsari, I. (2023). Physical quality of KUB chicken carcass supplemented with turmeric. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1230, 12157. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1230/1/012157

Steenhuis, I. H. M., Waterlander, W. E., & de Mul, A. (2011). Consumer food choices: the role of price and pricing strategies. Public Health Nutrition, 14(12), 2220–2226. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S1368980011001637

Tamzil, M., & Indarsih, B. (2022). Revisit the Development of Native Indonesian Chickens from Red Jungle Fowls (Gallus gallus bankiva) to Commercial Chickens. Indonesian Bulletin of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 32. https://doi.org/10.14334/wartazoa.v32i1.2585

Downloads

Published

2024-01-29

How to Cite

Edwin, T., Hellyward, J. ., Rastosari, A. ., Utami, Y. ., Suharto, E. L. S. ., & Novarista, N. . (2024). Conjoint Analysis: Consumer Preferences of Kampong Chicken in Bukittinggi City. Andalasian Livestock, 1(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.25077/alive.v1.n1.p51-58.2024

Issue

Section

Articles